Prometheus Wiki
Loading...
 
Tags: clonality

Clonality, bud banks and below-ground storage organs

Admin26202 points 
Contributors : Adrienne Nicotra2721 points 


Protocols that receive sufficient votes and a high star rating will be considered for Gold Leaf Status by the PrometheusWiki Editorial Board.



 

Author Affliations

This article is modified from Perez-Harguindeguy et al (2013). The "New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide" is a product of and is hosted by Nucleo Diversus (with additional Spanish translation). For more on this trait and on its context as part of the entire trait handbook visit its primary site Nucleo DiverSus at http://www.nucleodiversus.org/?lang=en

 

Summary

Clonality is the ability of a plant species to reproduce or regenerate itself vegetatively, thereby producing new ‘ramets’ (above-ground units) and expanding horizontally. Clonality can give plants competitive vigour and the ability to exploit patches rich in key resources (e.g. nutrients, water, light). Clonal behaviour may be an effective means of short-distance migration under circumstances of poor seed dispersal or seedling recruitment. Clonality also gives a plant the ability to form a bud bank, which can be a very important determinant of recovery and persistence after environmental disturbances. The bud bank consists of all viable axillary and adventitious buds that are present on a plant and are at its disposal for branching, replacement of shoots, regrowth after severe seasons (winter, dry season, fire season), or for vegetative regeneration after injury (adventitious buds that arise after the injury, which are an important means of regeneration in some plants, apparently lie outside the ‘bud bank’ concept). Both the characteristics of the bud bank and the type of clonal growth exhibited by plants determine their ability to recover from disturbances. Clonal organs, especially below-ground ones, also serve as storage and perennating organs; a sharp distinction between these functions is often impossible.

 

How to collect and classify clonality?

For above-ground clonal structures, observe a minimum of five plants that are far enough apart to be unlikely to be interconnected, and that are well developed. For below-ground structures, dig up a minimum of five healthy-looking plants (Table 1 in Selection of species and replicates for functional trait analysis). In some cases (large and heavy root systems), partial excavation may give sufficient evidence for classification. It is best to assess clonality and bud banks near the end of the growing season. Remove the soil and dead plant parts before counting buds or classifying the organs. The species is considered clonal if at least one plant clearly has one of the clonal organs listed below (see References below for discussion).

Categories are then:

  1. clonal organs absent;
  2. clonal organs present above ground, including the following:

    1. stolons – specialised, often hyper-elongated horizontal stems whose axillary bud growth and nodal rooting yields ultimately independent plants (e.g. strawberry (Fragaria vesca), saxifrage (Saxifraga flagellaris));
    2. bulbils – deciduous, rooting bulblets produced from axillary or what would otherwise be flower buds, or by adventitious bud growth on leaves (e.g. Cardamine pratensis,Bryophyllum); analogous vegetative propagules of bryophytes are termed gemmae; and
    3. simple fragmentation of the vegetative plant body (mostly aquatic plants, and bryophytes); and
  3. clonal organs present below ground, including the following:

    1. rhizomes – more or less horizontal, below-ground stems, usually bearing non-photosynthetic scale leaves (e.g. many grasses and sedges), and sometimes instead bearing photosynthetic leaves that emerge above ground (e.g. Iris,Viola, bracken fern (Pteridium)); aerial, vegetative and/or reproductive shoots grow up from axillary (or sometimes terminal) buds on the rhizome; most rhizomes can branch, after which decline and decay of the portion proximal to the branch point yields independent, clonally generated individuals;
    2. tubers and turions – conspicuously thickened, below-ground stems or rhizomes, functioning as carbohydrate storage organs and bearing axillary buds, that can propagate the plant (e.g. potato Solanum tuberosum, Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus)); similar organs formed on aquatic plants are termed turions;
    3. bulbs – relatively short, below-ground stems that bear concentrically nested, fleshy scale-leaves that act as storage organs, the whole globose structure serving to perennate the plant and, through growth of axillary buds within the bulb into daughter bulbs or ‘offsets’, to multiply it vegetatively (e.g. tulip (Tulipa), onion (Allium));
    4. corms – vertically oriented, globosely thickened underground stems that serve as storage organs and bear either scale or foliage leaves; axillary or terminal buds on the corm function for perennation and to a limited extent for clonal reproduction (e.g. Dahlia);
    5. tuberous roots – thickened roots that serve primarily for storage but can form adventitious buds that permit clonal propagation (e.g. sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas));
    6. suckers – shoots developed from adventitious buds produced on ordinary, non-storage roots (e.g. aspen (Populus tremuloides), wild plum (Prunus spp.)); the sucker shoots can become independent plants once the root connection between them and the parent is severed or dies;
    7. lignotuber – a massive, woody expansion just below the ground surface, produced by secondary growth of the ‘root crown’ in many shrubs in fire-prone vegetation; after a fire that kills the shrub’s aerial canopy, adventitious buds on the lignotuber grow out to regenerate the shrub’s canopy (see Resprouting capacity after major disturbance), normally not resulting in clonal multiplication; and
    8. layering – ordinary vegetative shoots that lie on or bend down to the ground, there produce adventitious roots and continue apical growth, becoming independent plants when their connection with the parent is severed (e.g. blackberry and raspberry (Rubus), certain spp. of spruce (Picea) and hemlock (Tsuga)).

If a plant species has clonal growth (Categories B or C above), classify it according to one or more of the following categories:

  1. regenerative clonal growth, occurring after injury and normally not multiplying the number of individuals, as with resprouting from a lignotuber;
  2. additive (also termed multiplicative) clonal growth, which can be either the plant’s normal mode of multiplication or can be induced by environmental conditions such as high nutrient availability, and serves to promote the spread of the plant;
  3. necessary clonal growth is indicated when clonality is required for the year-to-year survival of the plant, as with many plants that perennate from rhizomes, bulbs, tubers or tuberous roots and have no, or weak, seed reproduction.

Clonal growth may fulfil more than one of these functions, in which case it may not be possible to distinguish between them. In some cases, the functional nature of clonal growth may be simply

  1. unknown or not evident, in which case it may be recorded as such.

Characterization of the bud bank.

Both the location and seasonality of the bud bank affect a plant’s ability to spread vegetatively and recover from disturbance or injury. Characterize a clonal species according to the following categories based on Klimeš and Klimešova (2005) and Klimešova and Klimeš (2006):

A. Vertical distribution of the bud bank. Count the number of buds per clonal fragment (shoot or belowground stem or root) for each height layer, and classify as follows:

  1. no buds per clonal fragment,
  2. 1-10 buds per clonal fragment,
  3. >10 buds per clonal fragment.

Assign this classification for each of the height layers: >10 cm below the surface, -10 to 0 cm below the surface, at the soil surface, 0 to 10 cm above the soil surface, and >10cm above the soil surface.

B. Seasonal distribution of the bud bank. For aboveground and belowground clonal fragments, classify the buds as being:

  1. seasonal,
  2. perennial,
  3. seasonal and potential, or
  4. perennial and potential.

Perennial buds are found on perennial organs, such as woody stems, perennial shoot bases, or rhizomes (e.g. Trifolium pratense, Agropyron, repens, Petasites hybridus). Seasonal buds are found on transient organs, such as aboveground stems of herbs, stem tubers, bulbs, and bulbils (e.g. Stachys palustris, Ficaria verna, Allium vineale, Dentaria bulbifera). Potential buds are those that are formed adventitiously de novo following disturbance, such as on roots that produce regenerative or regular adventitious suckers (e.g. Potentilla anserina, Convolvulus arvensis). Obviously, unlike the other observations, development of potential buds can only be assessed sometime after a plant is actually injured.

Four other clonal traits may provide useful information on plant response to disturbance or injury, but require observations over time on marked shoots or individuals to classify them. These traits are (1) average lifespan of a shoot (<1 year or >1 year), (2) persistence of the connection between parent and offspring shoots (< 1 year, 1-2 years, and > 2 years), (3) average number of offspring shoots per parent shoot per year (<1 shoot, 1 shoot, 2-10 shoots, and >10 shoots), and (4) mean rate of lateral spread per year (<0.01 m, 0.01-0.25 m, >0.25 m). This last trait does not apply to dispersible reproductive structures such as turions that become disconnected from the parent shoot and can travel long distances.

There are now several plant trait databases in which clonal growth and bud bank types have been categorized for different species using classifications similar to that given here. For north-western and central Europe, these include the LEDA database and the CLO-PLA database.

 

Literature references

References on theory, significance and large datasets:

De Kroon H, Van Groenendael JM (1997) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands

Klimeš L, Klimešová J (2005) Clonal traits. In The LEDA traitbase. Collecting and measuring standards of life-history traits of the northwest European flora. Eds IC Knevel, RM Bekker, D Kunzmann, M Stadler, K Thompson, pp. 66–88. University of Groningen: Groningen, The Netherlands

Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Hendriks RJJ, Van Groenendael JM (1997) Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function. In The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Eds H De Kroon, JM Van Groenendael, pp. 1–29. Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands

Klimešová J, Klimeš L (2007) Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration – A literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8, 115–129 doi:101016/jppees200610002

Knevel IC, Bekker RM, Kleyer M (2003) Life-history traits of the northwest European flora: the LEDA database. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 611–614 doi:101111/j1654-11032003tb02188x

Van Groenendael JM, Klimeš L, Klimešova J, Hendriks RJJ (1997) Comparative ecology of clonal plants. In Plant life histories. Eds JL Harper, J Silvertown, M Franco, pp. 191–209. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK 

More on methods:

BöhmW (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Ecological studies 33. Springer: Berlin

Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Hendriks RJJ, Van Groenendael JM (1997) Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function. In The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Eds H De Kroon, JM Van Groenendael, pp. 1–29. Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands

Klimeš L, Klimešová J (2005) Clonal traits. In The LEDA traitbase. Collecting and measuring standards of life-history traits of the northwest European flora. Eds IC Knevel, RM Bekker, D Kunzmann, M Stadler, K Thompson, pp. 66–88. University of Groningen: Groningen, The Netherlands

Van Groenendael JM, Klimeš L, Klimešova J, Hendriks RJJ (1997) Comparative ecology of clonal plants. In Plant life histories. Eds JL Harper, J Silvertown, M Franco, pp. 191–209. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK 

Weiher E, Clarke GDP, Keddy PA (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81, 309–322 doi:102307/3547051

 


Contributors to this page: Admin26202 points  and Adrienne Nicotra2721 points  .
Page last modified on Saturday 27 of July, 2013 15:59:37 EST by Admin26202 points . (Version 12)